![]() |
||||
|
Profile
Buy Goodbye, Darwin
Amazon.com
Buy Blurred Line
Amazon.com
The Short Stuff
"Learning Magic From Mint" - published May 2007 in Atomjack
Submissions Log
Total Subs: 25
Quality Blogs
Scalzi's Whatever
Archives
March 2005
Et Cetera
Cavan @ Last.fm
Feeds
|
I've read through the bulk of stories that have come in so far at Fusion Fragment and I just wanted to mention the main reason behind my rejections. Actually, this issue was behind a lot of the rejections for Goodbye, Darwin, too, so if you're a writer, you might want to listen up. A significant number of the stories I've received are perfectly serviceable, solid pieces. But that's all they are. It seems as if the writers have come up with an idea, a character and then written the story with a "let's get in, write the damn thing, and get the hell out" kind of mentality. What this produces, ultimately, is sterility. And I'm reading a lot of sterile stories. Let me put together an analogy here. Remember in grade school, when you had to do presentations on stuff? I had to do them all the time. Anyhow, you'd get marks on the academic side of things and you'd also get marks on your presentation skills. Now, in an SF story, your characters, plot and ideas are your academic marks. If you don't have those...well, then you don't have a thing. The kid who gets up in front of the class and makes something up that's way off base, or stammers out a whole lot of nothing until the teachers tells him to sit down...yeah, that's you. But most kids, they have all that stuff. Most of the people who have submitted stories to me so far, they're getting full academic marks. But when it comes time for the presentation, they're reading information off a bland piece of bristol board in a monotone voice. There's no life, no spark. Everything's related matter-of-factly. All the sentences sound the same. So, how to punch it up? Well, if you're writing a short story, I'm a big fan of switching to first-person. Benjamin put up an interesting post on writing in the first-person yesterday, in response to somewhat who asked if it was detrimental to do so. Well, a lot of people dislike first-person, but I don't count myself among them. For short stories, I actually prefer it. Why? Well, you've got about 5000 words to tell a whole story, which doesn't leave much room for characterization. I like to use first-person because it allows me to rely on voice, which is a terrific way of both letting your reader identify with your character and also for injecting a little flair into your story. If you're opposed to the first-person, make sure you're thinking about your sentence structure. Sure, it might sound boring, but if all your sentences sound the same, well, then you sound boring, which is exponentially worse. You might also want to aim for some interesting settings. Some people rail on against stories with a lot of description, but you know what's prevailing in the stories I've received? No description of setting, or very cursory and obvious ones. Don't be afraid of a paragraph of description every now and again - it's not going to alienate your reader unless you go overboard on the frequency of descriptions, or you have purple prose issues. So, those are the tips from the editor for the day. Questions? Comments?
Cavan blogged at 6:10 PM |
5 comments
|
0/0
Listening
Reading
Watching
Wishlist
|
||
|
|
||||